Hobby Lobby Case
I mentioned that this Hobby Lobby Case might have something
to do with the FAA suspending the approval of Commercial UAS operations. Well
if it didn’t it will. If Hobby Lobby were a publicly held company it would not
have been able to exercise its first amendment rights but because they are not
a public company, that makes the company property of the owners and theirs
alone and as property owners they have the say in what goes on, on their
property. Just like a farmer or a rancher. The same right apply when it comes
to using equipment, like a Drone/UAS.
No comments:
Post a Comment